MM9 and Saraswati: Choose Words That Help a Correction Be Heard
Our MM9 reflection seeks Saraswati’s blessings for clear, considerate correction: check the facts, name the specific issue and offer a practical way forward.
During a team presentation rehearsal, a colleague gives the example before explaining the question it is meant to answer. We notice two listeners looking puzzled. “You always mix things up” is already forming in our mouth. MM9 brings us at Ishta Mel to the moment before those words are spoken. We seek Saraswati’s blessings for language that helps the work improve while preserving the other person’s ability to listen, think and respond with dignity.
The correction may be necessary. A confusing sequence can weaken a shared presentation, and staying silent will not help the colleague prepare. The question is how to make the observation useful. We need words that direct attention towards a particular change, instead of making the person defend their intelligence, effort or place in the team.
Check what gives us grounds to correct
Before speaking, we should confirm the basis of our observation. Did the group agree on an order, or do we merely prefer another one? Is the colleague following an older outline because we forgot to share the revision? A correction delivered with certainty can still be unfair if our account leaves out relevant information.
We can look at the current outline and the actual sequence used in the rehearsal. If the question is meant to come before the example, we have a clear reference point. If no sequence was agreed, we should offer a suggestion and its reason. “Could we introduce the question first so the example has a clearer purpose?” accurately presents a proposal as a proposal.
This accuracy is part of respectful speech. Saraswati’s association with learning and expression can remind us to bring understanding before fluency. The most polished phrasing cannot repair a correction based on an unchecked assumption. Taking a moment to establish what we know makes the words that follow more trustworthy.
Name a visible event and its practical effect
A useful opening stays close to what happened: “In that run, the example came before the question.” It gives the listener a specific moment to examine. We can then explain the relevant effect: “I found it difficult to see what the example was answering.” The person can consider the order without first accepting a sweeping description of their character.
Words such as “always”, “careless” or “hopeless” often add more accusation than information. They widen one observable problem into an argument about the person’s entire record. Even when we remember several similar incidents, we can begin with the present instance and the change it needs. If a recurring pattern deserves discussion, it can be described later with concrete examples.
We should also distinguish our own experience from an invented consensus. Seeing puzzled faces does not entitle us to say, “Nobody understood anything.” We can speak for ourselves or ask the listeners what was unclear. In our MM9 reflection, careful language means being as precise about our evidence as we want the colleague to be about the presentation.
Choose a moment that serves the correction
If the rehearsal can continue without spreading the confusion, we can wait for the speaker to finish the section. Interrupting every sentence may prevent them from completing a thought and make the practice difficult to evaluate. A brief note allows us to remember the issue while giving the person space to speak.
When an immediate adjustment is needed for the group to proceed, the correction can be short and practical: “Let us take the question first, then return to this example.” We do not need to explain the colleague’s shortcomings in front of everyone. Once the shared task is moving again, any fuller discussion can happen in a suitable setting.
The setting deserves particular care when we hold more authority or experience. A junior member may find it difficult to answer back, even if our assumption is mistaken. We can leave an opening: “Is there a reason you chose that order?” Then we should actually listen. Asking a question while preparing our next criticism offers the appearance of dialogue without its attention.
Give the person something workable to try
A correction becomes easier to use when it includes a manageable next step. In the presentation, we might suggest placing one sentence before the example: “The question we are trying to answer is…” We can ask the colleague to try that sequence once and see whether it makes the connection clearer. The request is small enough to act on immediately.
We should avoid turning one correction into an inventory of everything we would change. Voice, posture, timing and slide design may all invite comment, but the current difficulty concerns sequence. Keeping the focus narrow helps the person know where to put their attention. Other observations can wait until they are relevant and there is room to use them.
There is also room for the colleague’s own solution. They may prefer to keep the example first but add a brief framing question before it. If that addresses the difficulty, we can accept it. The purpose of speaking is to improve understanding, and a useful correction allows the person to remain an active contributor to that improvement.
Let the response shape the next exchange
After giving the correction, we can pause. The colleague may ask for clarification, explain an intention or need a moment to try the change. We do not have to fill that space with repeated versions of the same criticism. Listening now helps us discover whether our words were clear enough to use.
If we spoke sharply, we can repair the manner directly: “That came out harshly. The issue I want to discuss is the order of these two parts.” This acknowledges our conduct while returning to a specific, useful topic. Care for the relationship and care for the work can support each other in the same conversation.
When the next run becomes clearer, we can acknowledge the exact improvement: “The opening question helped me follow the example.” At Ishta Mel, this completes the responsibility we consider through MM9: notice accurately, speak with care and recognise the effect of a thoughtful change. Remembering Saraswati, we can leave the colleague with a clearer presentation and words they can carry into their next attempt without carrying an unnecessary wound.